DOHPass Question bank →

DOH · DHA · MOH — General Practitioner

DOH, DHA & MOH GP (General Practitioner) Exam Questions

Practice questions for the UAE GP licensing exams (DOH, DHA and MOH Prometric), each with a worked explanation, the wrong-option traps, and the guideline it rests on. Built by an MRCP-qualified doctor.

900+ questions Written by an MRCP doctor Full explanations & references

Try 5 free sample questions

Real questions from the DOHPass bank, with the full clinical reasoning behind each answer. Tap to reveal.

Q1 Appendicitis

Fatima, a 26-year-old Emirati woman, presents to the emergency department with a 16-hour history of progressive right-sided abdominal pain. The pain initially began in the periumbilical region and has now localised to the right iliac fossa. She reports anorexia and two episodes of nausea but no vomiting. Her last menstrual period was 10 days ago. She has no significant past medical or surgical history. On examination, her temperature is 37.9°C, heart rate 94 bpm, blood pressure 118/72 mmHg. Abdominal examination reveals tenderness and guarding in the right iliac fossa with a positive Rovsing sign. Rebound tenderness is present. Urine pregnancy test is negative. Full blood count shows white cell count 14.2 × 10⁹/L with neutrophilia (82%), haemoglobin 132 g/L, platelets 265 × 10⁹/L. C-reactive protein is 48 mg/L. Her Alvarado score is calculated at 8. The surgical team requests imaging to confirm the diagnosis before proceeding. What is the most appropriate first-line imaging modality for this patient?

  • A Abdominal radiograph
  • B Contrast-enhanced CT abdomen and pelvis
  • C Diagnostic laparoscopy
  • D MRI abdomen and pelvis
  • E Transabdominal ultrasonography
Model answer + full explanation

Why correct: In a young woman of reproductive age presenting with suspected acute appendicitis, transabdominal ultrasonography (graded compression ultrasound) is the recommended first-line imaging modality. This approach is endorsed by multiple guidelines including the EAES 2015 consensus and the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria (2019 revision). Ultrasonography avoids ionising radiation, which is particularly important in young women, and can simultaneously evaluate gynaecological pathology (ovarian torsion, ruptured ovarian cyst, ectopic pregnancy) that may mimic appendicitis. In experienced hands, USS has a sensitivity of 71–94% and specificity of 81–98% for appendicitis. An Alvarado score of 8 is high (≥7 indicates high probability of appendicitis), but the surgical team has specifically requested imaging confirmation, and ultrasound serves as the appropriate initial step. If ultrasound is inconclusive, CT can then be considered as a second-line investigation.

Why A wrong: Abdominal radiograph has extremely limited sensitivity and specificity for appendicitis. A faecolith may occasionally be visible, but plain radiographs cannot reliably confirm or exclude appendicitis and are not recommended for this purpose by any current guideline.

Why B wrong: Contrast-enhanced CT abdomen and pelvis has the highest sensitivity (94–98%) and specificity (95–98%) for diagnosing appendicitis. However, it exposes the patient to significant ionising radiation (approximately 8–10 mSv) and is therefore not the recommended first-line modality in young women of reproductive age. CT is reserved as a second-line investigation when USS is inconclusive, per the ACR Appropriateness Criteria (2019) and WSES Jerusalem Guidelines (2020).

Why C wrong: Diagnostic laparoscopy is an invasive surgical procedure that can be both diagnostic and therapeutic. However, proceeding directly to laparoscopy bypasses non-invasive imaging and carries risks of general anaesthesia and surgical complications. It is not appropriate as a first-line diagnostic imaging step when non-invasive options are available.

Why D wrong: MRI abdomen and pelvis is an excellent radiation-free modality with high sensitivity and specificity for appendicitis. It is the preferred imaging in pregnant patients when USS is inconclusive. However, in a non-pregnant young woman, MRI is not the standard first-line investigation due to higher cost, limited availability, longer scan times, and the need for patient cooperation. Ultrasound remains the initial choice.

Key learning point: In young women of reproductive age with clinically suspected appendicitis, transabdominal ultrasound is the first-line imaging modality to avoid ionising radiation and to simultaneously exclude gynaecological differential diagnoses. CT is reserved for cases where ultrasound is inconclusive.

Q2 Fractures

A 65-year-old postmenopausal woman presents to the GP clinic after slipping and landing on her outstretched right hand. She reports immediate pain and swelling over the wrist. Her PMH includes a DEXA scan two years ago showing a T-score of -2.8 at the lumbar spine. On examination, there is a visible deformity of the distal forearm, point tenderness over the distal radius, and neurovascularly intact fingers. A plain X-ray of the wrist is obtained. Which of the following X-ray findings would be MOST consistent with the most likely diagnosis in this patient?

  • A Dorsal displacement and angulation of the distal radial fragment
  • B Volar displacement and angulation of the distal radial fragment
  • C Intra-articular fracture of the dorsal radial rim without displacement of the shaft
  • D Fracture through the waist of the scaphoid with no visible cortical break on AP view
Model answer + full explanation

The most likely diagnosis is Colles' fracture — the most common wrist fracture in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis following a FOOSH mechanism. Its hallmark radiographic features are dorsal displacement and dorsal angulation of the distal radial fragment, producing the classic 'dinner fork' deformity clinically (Option A). Option B describes a Smith's fracture (reverse Colles'), caused by a fall on a flexed wrist, producing volar angulation. Option C describes a Barton's fracture, an intra-articular shear fracture of the dorsal or volar radial rim, which is inherently unstable and often requires surgical fixation. Option D describes a scaphoid fracture, which typically presents with anatomical snuffbox tenderness and may be radiographically occult initially — not consistent with the described deformity. Pearl: In a postmenopausal woman sustaining a fragility wrist fracture, initiation of osteoporosis treatment (bisphosphonate ± calcium/vitamin D) should be considered, as this event signals high future fracture risk per NICE NG187 (2023).

Q3 Thyroid Physiology

A 42-year-old woman is diagnosed with primary hypothyroidism after presenting with fatigue, weight gain, cold intolerance, and a TSH of 18 mU/L with a low free T4. Her GP is reviewing the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid (HPT) axis to explain her condition. Which of the following statements about thyroid hormone physiology is INCORRECT?

  • A TRH is produced by the hypothalamus and stimulates TSH release from the anterior pituitary
  • B TSH stimulates iodine uptake into thyroid follicular cells via the sodium-iodide symporter
  • C TSH directly converts T4 to T3 within thyroid follicular cells
  • D TSH stimulates the synthesis and secretion of both T4 and T3 from the thyroid gland
  • E The majority of circulating T3 is derived from peripheral deiodination of T4 in tissues such as the liver and kidney
Model answer + full explanation

The correct answer is C. TSH does NOT convert T4 to T3. T4-to-T3 conversion occurs predominantly in peripheral tissues — liver, kidney, and skeletal muscle — via type 1 and type 2 iodothyronine deiodinase enzymes (encoded by DIO1 and DIO2). Within the thyroid gland itself, only a small fraction (~20%) of T3 is secreted directly; the remaining ~80% of circulating T3 derives from peripheral deiodination of T4. This distinction is clinically relevant: patients on levothyroxine (T4) rely on peripheral conversion for most of their T3, explaining why some symptomatic patients may have impaired conversion despite normal TSH.

Option A is true — TRH from the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus acts on thyrotrophs in the anterior pituitary. Option B is true — TSH upregulates the sodium-iodide symporter (NIS, encoded by SLC5A5). Option D is true — TSH drives thyroglobulin synthesis, iodination, and hormone release. Option E is true and reinforces the teaching point of C.

Reference: Williams Textbook of Endocrinology (14th ed.); NICE NG145 (2023); ATA/AACE Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Q4 Melanoma

A 58-year-old fair-skinned man presents to his GP in Abu Dhabi concerned about a lesion on his upper back. He noticed it approximately 6 months ago and reports it has grown and darkened since. On examination, the lesion measures 15 mm in diameter and displays asymmetry, an irregular scalloped border, and variegated pigmentation including brown, black, and red hues. There is no satellite lesion or palpable lymphadenopathy. What is the most appropriate next step in management?

  • A Reassure and review in 6 months; likely benign melanocytic naevus
  • B Urgent 2-week-wait referral to dermatology for excision biopsy
  • C Routine referral within 18 weeks; monitor with dermoscopy at GP level
  • D Apply topical retinoid and reassess in 6 weeks
  • E Reassure; appearance is consistent with seborrhoeic keratosis
Model answer + full explanation

This lesion fulfils all five ABCDE criteria for melanoma: Asymmetry, Border irregularity, Colour variation (≥3 colours), Diameter >6 mm (15 mm), and Evolution over 6 months. Per NICE NG12 (updated 2023), any suspicious pigmented lesion meeting these features warrants an urgent 2-week-wait referral to a dermatologist for excision biopsy — this is the correct next step, not watchful waiting or GP-level dermoscopy. NICE NG14 (2022) further details assessment and management of suspected melanoma. Reassurance (A, E) is dangerous and incorrect given the high-risk features. Routine 18-week referral (C) introduces unacceptable delay. Topical retinoids (D) have no role in pigmented lesion assessment. Key pearl: in a GP setting, if ≥3 ABCDE criteria are present, treat as melanoma until proven otherwise and refer urgently.

Q5 Hypertension in Pregnancy

A 35-year-old woman at 24 weeks of gestation is seen in the antenatal clinic. Her blood pressure today is 148/94 mmHg on two readings 30 minutes apart. Her booking blood pressure at 10 weeks was 118/76 mmHg. She denies headache, visual disturbance, or epigastric pain. Urinalysis shows no proteinuria. Fetal movements are normal. What is the most appropriate initial diagnosis?

  • A Gestational hypertension
  • B Pre-eclampsia
  • C Chronic hypertension
  • D Pre-existing essential hypertension unmasked in pregnancy
  • E Transient hypertension of pregnancy requiring no further action
Model answer + full explanation

Gestational hypertension (GH) is defined as a sustained BP ≥140/90 mmHg arising after 20 weeks' gestation in a previously normotensive woman, in the absence of proteinuria or other features of pre-eclampsia (NICE NG133, 2023). This patient meets all criteria: new-onset hypertension at 24 weeks, normal booking BP, no proteinuria, and no systemic symptoms. Pre-eclampsia requires proteinuria (≥1+ on dipstick, confirmed by PCR ≥30 mg/mmol) or end-organ involvement (e.g. thrombocytopaenia, renal/hepatic impairment, neurological features) — absent here. Chronic hypertension is diagnosed when BP ≥140/90 predates 20 weeks or antedates pregnancy. GH requires close monitoring: up to 50% progress to pre-eclampsia, so two-weekly BP checks and urinalysis are mandated until delivery. Pearl: reclassification to pre-eclampsia may occur at any point, so the absence of proteinuria at diagnosis does not exclude future progression.

Topics covered in this bank

  • Appendicitis
  • Fractures
  • Thyroid Physiology
  • Melanoma
  • Hypertension in Pregnancy

Why candidates use DOHPass

Authored by a doctor who passed the exam

Every question is written and reviewed by an MRCP-qualified physician who has personally sat the DOH licensing exam — not scraped from leaked dumps.

Explanations that actually teach

Each answer comes with the reasoning, the wrong-option traps, and the guideline or trial it rests on — so you learn the principle, not just the key.

Specialist and GP tracks

Separate banks for Internal Medicine Specialist and General Practitioner candidates across DOH, DHA and MOH Prometric exams.

Frequently asked questions

Are these the real DHA or DOH GP exam questions?

No. They are original practice questions written to match the style and difficulty of the DOH, DHA and MOH GP Prometric exams — designed to teach the underlying reasoning rather than reproduce any official paper.

Who writes and checks the GP questions?

They are authored and reviewed by an MRCP-qualified doctor who has sat the DOH exam, with explanations grounded in current guidelines.

Do GP questions include worked explanations?

Yes — every question explains the correct answer, the wrong-option traps, and the source guideline so you learn the principle, not just the key.

Can I try some GP questions for free?

Yes. Practise the free samples on this page and grab the free 50-question mock exam before deciding on a plan.

Ready to practise properly?

Start with the free 50-question mock, then unlock the full bank.

See plans & pricing